Department of Chemistry Cambridge University Lensfield Rd, Cambridge CB2 1EW
In the past few decades numerous chiral reagents for the asymmetric reduction of carbonyl compounds have been developed. Although many of the earlier reagents exhibited only a poor optical induction in the reduction of prochiral ketones, a number of recently developed reagents have shown excellent success in this regard. One such successful reagent is diisopinocampheyl boron chloride.
(Ipc)2BCl
The mechanism of reduction is postulated to involve the formation of a Lewis acid-carbonyl complex complex between the reagent and the carbonyl compound, followed by transfer of a beta-hydrogen, liberating alpha-pinene. The hydrogen transfer is usually depicted as proceeding through a six-membered cyclic 'boatlike' transition state. The asymmetric induction is ascribed by this model to an unfavourable steric interaction between the larger of the two groups on the carbonyl and the beta methyl group on the isopinocampheyl unit:
However, this transition state model is incomplete in a number of respects. Firstly, (Ipc)2BCl reduces acetophenone in 98% ee, but reduces cyclohexyl methyl ketone in only 26% ee (Acc. Chem. Res 1992, 25, 17). This large difference in selectivity seems difficult to rationalise on simply steric grounds.
More recently, the following results from the reduction of fluorinated ketones with (Ipc)2BCl have been reported:
Based on the proposed mechanism for the reduction as given above, these results give a 'bulk' for the ketone substituents in the following order:
CF3 >> CHF2 > CH3 ~= n-hex > CH2F
which does not correlate well to the steric bulk of these substituents. A better understanding of the structure and electronic nature of the intermediate Lewis acid complex formed in this reaction is obviously necessary if predictions of the enetioselectivity of this reagent are to be made.
In an attempt to understand the factors affecting the stereoselectivity of this reagent, the structures of a number of dihydro- and dialkyl boron chloride complexes to various aldehydes and ketones were calculated using the 4-31G basis set, and some single point energies were obtained at the MP2/6-31G*//4-31G level. A selection of the structures calculated is shown below:
The short Cl-H distances observed in most of these structures is ascribed to a hydrogen bonding interaction. This interaction appears to have a reasonably large effect on the relative energies of the E and Z isomers of these adducts. A systematic study was performed examining the E / Z energy differences of complexes of H2BCl to various ketones.
Functional Group Relative to H Relative to Me Me 15.4 (11.6) 0.00 Et 18.2 2.25 C=C 17.0 (12.3) 11.56 C%C (alkynyl) 21.1 (14.6) 4.80 t-butyl 27.2 CH2F -5.30 CHF2 0.40 CF3 8.00
(Bracketed energies are MP2/6-31G*//4-31G, others are 4-31G//4-31G. The energy refers to the energetic penalty of making the indicated functional group syn to the boron.)
The E / Z energy differences that are observed for aliphatic ketones indicate an possible alternative explanation for the source of stereochemistry in (Ipc)2BCl reductions. If one of the two Ipc groups is much more likely to transfer a hydrogen to the carbonyl group than the other, then the enantiomeric excess of the product will be directly related to the E / Z energetic preference of coordination:
Work is currently proceeding on developing an extension to the MM2 force field to allow molecular modelling of these complexes and establish whether one of the two diastereomeric isopinocampheyl groups is indeed significantly more likely to transfer a hydrogen than the other.
This model explains the previously discussed results of reduction of fluorinated ketones: the order of preference of the chlorine to be syn to a group is CH2F >> CH3 ~= CHF2 >> CF3, which accords well with the observed enantioselectivity.
The E / Z energy difference in R2BCl adducts to ketones and aldehydes is not simply dependent on steric effects.
A Cl-H hydrogen bond is often present in these complexes and has a strong influence on their conformational preferences.
The enantioselectivity of the asymmetric reduction reagent (Ipc)2BCl can be directly related to the E / Z energetic preference of coordination.