Chemical Informatics Letters

Index

• Warr
  • Warr Zone (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2003, 7, #5, 57)

• Watch
  • Search Engine Watch (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2000, 1, #6)

• WAX
  • WAX (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 4, #6)

• Way
  • Way Back Machine (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 4, #1)

• we
  • Are we cleverer because of technology? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #5, 51)

• WebFountain
  • WebFountain [IBM] (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 8, #2, 15)

• website
  • Nature Biotechnology Directory Website (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 8, #4, 48)
  • Launch of DSSTox website (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 8, #5, 55)
  • Website access for disabled people (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #4, 40)
  • Ugly web sites can work well (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #4, 44)

• websites
  • UK Government closes websites to improve information transfer (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 14, #2, 15)
  • Ugly web sites can work well (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #4, 44)
  • Making Websites Usable (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #4, 43)

• Weisstein
  • Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 4, #2)

• well
  • Does the open-source software mechanism work well? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #5, 58)
  • Ugly web sites can work well (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #4, 44)

• Wellcome
  • The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #3, 30)
  • Wellcome Trust position on open access (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #4, 39)
  • European PubMed? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #6, 66)
  • Wellcome Trust requires Open Source publishing (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #3, 27)

• What
  • What If (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2001, 3, #6)
  • What Every Chemist Should Know about Patents (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 4, #6)
  • What is there? (WIT) (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2001, 3, #3)

• Who
  • Who Owns Lecture Notes? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2000, 1, #5)
  • Drug names (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #2, 24)
  • Who will win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #3, 35)
  • WHO/TDR Malaria Database (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 5, #3, 5)

• Why
  • Why don't chemists like preprints? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #2, 17)

• Wide
  • World Wide Web Consortium Issues XML Schema as a W3C Recommendation (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2001, 2, #6)
  • The World Wide Web Consortium (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #3, 30)

• widens
  • ACS widens access to its journals (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #3, 26)

• Wiki
  • Wiki (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2003, 7, #5, 58)
  • Chemical Information Sources Wiki (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 13, #4, 39)
  • Wikipedia accuracy (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #5, 57)
  • RSS (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #2, 13)
  • Scientometrics (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #6, 66)
  • Stigler's law of eponymy (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #3, 27)
  • Unsolved problems in chemistry (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 14, #3, 35)
  • Wikipedia Semi-protection Policy (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #6, 66)
  • Machines that can make anything (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 14, #3, 30)

• Wikipedia
  • Wikipedia accuracy (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #5, 57)
  • Wikipedia (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #2, 19)
  • RSS (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #2, 13)
  • Scientometrics (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #6, 66)
  • Stigler's law of eponymy (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #3, 27)
  • Unsolved problems in chemistry (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 14, #3, 35)
  • Wikipedia Semi-protection Policy (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #6, 66)
  • Wikipedia accuracy (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #5, 55)
  • Wikipedia (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2003, 7, #1, 6)

• Wiley
  • Wiley and e-Journal Archiving (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #4, 45)

• will
  • Who will win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #3, 35)

• win
  • Who will win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #3, 35)

• WIT
  • What is there? (WIT) (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2001, 3, #3)

• with
  • The Challenges with Substance Databases and Structure Search Engines (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #1, 8)
  • Elsevier MDL collaborates with NIH on PubChem (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #3, 29)
  • The Challenges with Substance Databases and Structure Search Engines (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #3, 36)

• Wolfram
  • Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 4, #2)
  • Wolfram demonstrations (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 14, #5, 56)

• Wood
  • Alan Wood's Pesticide Names (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 13, #3, 35)

• word
  • Google raises search word limit to 32 (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #6, 71)
  • Google's word limit (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #3, 34)

• words
  • Chemical words (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #6, 64)

• work
  • Does the open-source software mechanism work well? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #5, 58)
  • Ugly web sites can work well (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #4, 44)

• Workbench
  • Molecular Workbench (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 14, #1, 11)

• Working
  • Human Genome Project Working Draft Sequence (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2000, 1, #1)

• Workshop
  • Lausanne Workshop on Chemical Information (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 8, #4, 38)
  • CODATA Workshop on Strategies for Permanent Access to Scientific Information (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 12, #4, 37)
  • Recent Developments in Chemoinformatics (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #3, 28)
  • W3C Workshop on Semantic Web for Life Sciences (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #5, 50)

• world
  • The Scientific World (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2000, 1, #5)
  • World Wide Web Consortium Issues XML Schema as a W3C Recommendation (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2001, 2, #6)
  • World Technology Awards (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 4, #1)
  • Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 4, #2)
  • Vatican library closed (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 15, #1, 10)
  • European Libraries counter Google (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #4, 48)
  • world standards (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #4, 43)
  • Are institutional repositories taking over the world? (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 11, #4, 47)
  • QSAR World (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 14, #4, 46)
  • Chemistry World (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2006, 13, #2, 22)
  • The World Wide Web Consortium (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2005, 10, #3, 30)
  • World Community Grid (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #6, 65)
  • World Standards Day (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2003, 7, #3, 31)

• WorldSciNet
  • WorldSciNet (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2002, 5, #5, 6)

• WorldWideScience
  • WorldWideScience (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2007, 15, #1, 11)

• wrong
  • Statistics can be wrong (Chem. Inf. Lett. 2004, 9, #1, 2)